• blog
  • formulas and processes
  • about
  • quarterly newsletter
Menu

Grainy Vision

  • blog
  • formulas and processes
  • about
  • quarterly newsletter
×

Foma Retrobrom (notice edge “drags”)

ModernLithRetro, the short version

Ashley <3 December 23, 2020

ModernLithRetro is a new formulation in my ModernLith developer series. It reverts to a more traditional lith developer formulation, but uses a specific discovery I encountered early on in my experiments. It isn’t quite as versatile or tray-stable as ModernLithEZ, but tends to give more consistent results. It also incorporates allowances for old brown addition to further tune the results and basically give the same general “feel” as a traditional lith developer. It also gives good results on many vintage and modern lithable papers, while also working with a few modern non-lithable papers.

I had a long form write up like I typically do written up, but ultimately all the concepts and such are still not quite clear enough I can explain it. So, instead, I’ll do basically the bare minimum here which is give the instructions, formula, and some guidance on paper choice.

Ilford MGV RC (with edge fogging from adding thiocyanate but no benzotriazole)

Oxalic Acid Solution

Before we get into the formula, we must make at least one solution ahead of time. Oxalic acid is kind of a devil to work with when consistency is needed like here. Since the amount of acid is rather critical, and oxalic acid really loves to absorb water, a consistent concentration of it in solution must be made first before mixing the final developer. This is the easiest way I could figure to do it

  • Start with 400ml of distilled water, room temperature

  • Add 50g of oxalic acid (dihydrate)

  • Stir for several minutes, not all will dissolve.

  • Top to 500ml with water and stir a bit longer

  • If all of the oxalic acid dissolved, then add ~5g more at a time with stirring until it doesn’t dissolve.

  • The solution will have cooled down and may even have some condensation on the container

  • Finally, put the solution into a bottle. Do not worry about filtering. Make sure the bottle is clearly labeled and marked as POISON

  • Put the container in a refrigerator, preferably kept at ~5C. If the refrigerator is not dedicated to chemical use, then first put the bottle into a plastic bag and then put the container and bag into a bowl that would catch any spills. Oxalic acid is poisonous and any spills in a food containing fridge would necessitate throwing away all the food and doing a very thorough cleaning

  • Leave the container in the fridge for at least 24 hours

  • Filter the solution afterwards through a simple coffee filter. There will be many crystals caught by the filter. This can be dried and put back into your oxalic acid container or just disposed of.

  • The resulting solution should be kept at room temperature. The resulting solution will be somewhere around 4.8g oxalic acid per 100ml of water, or a 4.8% solution.

The reason for doing it like this is that it’s nearly impossible to keep oxalic acid in a dry form. If you pour out a standard grade you’d buy for cleaning, it will be clumpy and sticky as if it was wet. This is because it basically is. The problem is that the mixture is unevenly wet. The stuff at the bottom might be less wet than the top, and these errors in measurement can actually matter in this formula due to the relatively tight control on pH that is needed. In some experiments the amount of oxalic acid actually contributed by a single weight of the powder at separate times could vary by 10% or more. Thus, making a saturated solution, then using the common refrigerator (since not everyone’s house temperature is the same) to standardize on a solubility temperature is the easiest way to ensure that the amount of oxalic acid is consistent across environments. Also, if you have actual dried oxalic acid, that can work too in this, you just wouldn’t need as much. Basically regardless of source or dryness, it’ll all turn out the same.

Fomatone Warmtone Classic FB

Formula

The formula has a number of optional parts. See below for details. All parts should be mixed with distilled water

Part A:

  • 120ml of water

  • Add 60ml of oxalic acid solution

  • 6g hydroquinone

  • Top to 200ml with water. May require heating to dissolve all of the hydroquinone

Part B:

  • Start with 140ml of water

  • 0.8g sodium hydroxide (note: mine is nice and dry. If yours is clumpy and with a wet appearance, you may need to figure out drying, buy a better grade, or make a similar hydroxide solution)

  • 36g potassium carbonate (sodium carbonate can not be substituted)

  • 1.2g potassium bromide

  • 1ml of 1% PEG-3350 solution (optional-ish)

  • 10ml of 1% sodium thiocyanate solution (optional)

  • 15ml of 0.1% benzotriazole solution or 1.5ml of 1% benzotriazole (optional, can be dissolved in either 80:20 water to alcohol, or water to propylene/ethylene glycol)

  • 4.9g sodium sulfite

  • 20-40g of potassium oxalate (optional-ish)

  • Top to 200ml with water

  • The solution will appear slightly cloudy and slightly thick. Heat if needed

PEG-3350 can be sourced as MiraLAX over the counter laxative in the US. It is otherwise known as Polyethylene Glycol of molecular weight 3350.

Sodium thiocyanate and benzotriazole should both be used, or neither. Without benzotriazole, thiocyanate will cause fogging. Without thiocyanate, benzotriazole will cause excessive cooling of image tone and may prevent development. The combination gives a little more contrast, more grain, slightly slower development, brighter highlights, very slightly cooler tone results, and deeper blacks.

Potassium oxalate is used here as a preservative. Sodium oxalate can not be substituted due to solubility limits. As much as can be dissolved is the ideal amount of oxalate, but less can be used. Less than 20g in this formula seems to do so little as to not bother adding any at all. 40g may be difficult to dissolve and require heating. This developer will work without oxalate with minimal if any tonal difference, but the lack of it will reduce the tray life by around 50%.

It is possible to synthesize potassium oxalate from potassium hydroxide and oxalic acid. I’ve done it a few times, but I’ve yet to find an easy and consistent procedure for it considering both chemicals will absorb unequal amounts of water. If interested, please leave a comment. If potassium oxalate is really that expensive to source then I’ll work further on the synthesis process and document it later

Oriental FB (earlier prototype with uneven development)

Usage

Rinse all papers under running water before development to remove incorporated developers. For mixing the working solution, use between 20-80ml of part A with a matching amount of part B to 1L of water. Mixed ratios of A to B is completely untested with this formulation, but in previous formulations has given poor results. Add old brown as desired, typically between 50ml and 200ml. Too much old brown might cause uneven development, pepper fogging, or shorten tray life. Old brown that was tested in this case is exhausted solution from 50+50ml and 100+100ml to 1L solution. Personal recommendation as a starting point: 50+50 with 100ml of old brown added to 1L of water. Average development time with this personal recommendation is around 5-15m with most papers at a room temp of 72F. Compared to off the shelf commercial lith developers, the concentrates for this formula are about 60% strength (specifically, less hydroquinone in part A)

Regarding temperature, 90% of my testing was done at room temp, or slightly elevated (maybe ~85F). With very hot developer it tended to be much more likely to give uneven development and weaker blacks (due to infectious development taking off too early). Some papers however give the best results in hot developer, such as Ilford Warmtone FB

Foma Retrobrom (note edge “drags” aren’t too noticeable here due to vignetting and busy subject, but also this was an earlier prototype. Still unsure what the difference is)

Papers

The following papers were tested with this formulation or late prototypes of it:

  • Ilford MGV RC — Good, warm toned and high contrast

  • Ilford Warmtone RC — Similar to MGIV, but with colder brown tones

  • Fomaspeed VC RC — Decent, colder brown toned, moderate contrast. Susceptible to uneven development

  • Fomaspeed Grade 3 RC — Good, Similar to the VC version, but a bit better contrast and less likely to give uneven development

  • Fomabrom FB — Unsuitable, bad blacks, pepper drags

  • Foma Retrobrom FB — Decent, moderate contrast, olive tones. Susceptible to pepper drags and snow balls at times but not always. Outer edge of paper will over develop (edge “drags”)

  • Fomatone Warmtone Classic FB — Great, very warm, easily controlled moderate contrast, sometimes susceptible to uneven development

  • Ilford Cooltone FB — unsuitable, no shadows or black tones, pepper balling

  • Ilford Warmtone — ok, warm brown tones, gives kinda weak blacks, requires hot developer to prevent snowballs

  • Ilford MGIV RC — Ok, more reluctant to enter infectious development than MGV

  • Kentmere RC — Similar to MGIV, but with cooler tones

  • Kodabrome II RC (discontinued) — Bad, weak black tones, warm brown tones

  • Oriental FB — limited testing, gave good results

Fomaspeed VC RC (notice black “smudging” from nearly dead developer)

In reference Tags modernlith, darkroom, chemistry, lith printing
← IntermissionProcessing ECN-2 film, in ECN-2 process, at home →

Search Posts

No results found
Post Archive
  • experiment report
  • reference
  • Picture Sets
  • meta
  • Photography
  • in the margins
  • newsletter
 

Recent Posts

Featured
September 20, 2026
This exists again
September 20, 2026
Read more →
September 20, 2026
February 8, 2022
Research in progress (February 2022)
February 8, 2022
Read more →
February 8, 2022
double-xx+@+500.jpeg
January 11, 2022
Happy New Year! - A newsletter from Grainy Vision
January 11, 2022

Hi everyone and happy new year! The last email was… (checks notes) almost 2 years ago, but I figured it’s time to break the silence on the newsletter front. There’s been a great number of things done and written about since the previous email, so I’ll only cover the most interesting and the most recent.

Read more →
January 11, 2022
ilford mgv rc2.jpeg
December 16, 2021
GVL1 - Long Lasting Warmtone PQ Print Developer
December 16, 2021

Today I’m introducing an unexpectedly successful developer. I mixed this up just kind of guessing at ratios and just wanting to see what a dilute PQ print developer could do. The actual end result is a formula somewhat reminiscent of ID-78, a warmtone print developer formula created by Ilford, but with notable differences. The end result is a developer with a surprisingly good shelf life, tray life and contrast consistency across its life span. It also is a fairly unique developer producing warmtones which are resistant to going olive colored, instead it will go toward brown tones.

Read more →
December 16, 2021
GVM1 - A unique film developer for pushing, portraits, and landscapes
December 15, 2021
GVM1 - A unique film developer for pushing, portraits, and landscapes
December 15, 2021

Lately I’ve been doing more regular darkroom printing and this has left me in a bit of a slump. Although I love many of the developer formulations I’ve made, they’ve often not been designed explicitly for darkroom printing. EXG1/GVG1 would produce excellent negatives with increased speed, fine grain, etc… but in the darkroom it was often very difficult to get everything on the negative onto the paper without resorting to lith printing. This problem was only slightly improved with GVK1. GVK6 (yet to be published) has significantly improved this problem, but these developers also reflected the time in my life at which they were formulated. I was doing almost exclusively lith printing and with early ModernLith formulations I needed extended scale and moderately high contrast negatives… So GVK1 specifically was formulated with this aim. EXG1 was formulated when my main priority was getting the best scannable negative, which also benefits from a long density range. And now, I’m doing regular darkroom printing a lot, so it calls for a developer with a new aim.

GVM1 is recommended for:

  • Extremely smoothed portraits of light skinned people in controlled light

  • High contrast landscape scenes

  • Pushing film to use it at increased speed without greatly increasing contrast

  • Taming the contrast of very high contrast materials

  • Getting all of the image detail onto a print in the darkroom without great difficulty

Read more →
December 15, 2021
November 2, 2021
Lith Printing Densitometry Placeholder
November 2, 2021
Read more →
November 2, 2021
249773816_10222235527464311_1608421339047696831_n.jpeg
October 31, 2021
BasicLith, a dead simple lith developer formula for modern papers
October 31, 2021
Read more →
October 31, 2021
October 2, 2021
Intermission is done
October 2, 2021
Read more →
October 2, 2021

©2019-2026 Auburn Rhythm